A ceasefire is a formal agreement of the belligerents to end the fighting. This is not necessarily the end of a war, because it can only represent a cessation of hostilities while trying to negotiate a lasting peace. It is derived from the Latin arma, which means “weapons” (as in weapons) and stitium, which means “a stop.”  It is a walking metaphor for what Paravisini-Gebert describes as “colonial space,” which is “a two-coloured, ambivalent space in which familiar and unknown people mingle with a turbulent ceasefire.” A ceasefire is a modus vivendi and not a peace treaty whose agreement can take months or even years. The 1953 ceasefire agreement is an important example of a ceasefire that was not followed by a peace treaty. A ceasefire is also different from a ceasefire or ceasefire that involves a temporary cessation of hostilities for an agreed limited time or within a demarcated area. A ceasefire may be needed to negotiate a ceasefire. A ceasefire is the end of fighting between two or more people or parties in a conflict, especially temporary. Apple and Facebook have declared a temporary ceasefire in one of the many battles between the two tech giants. The ceasefire comes from the Latin sisters, which means “to get to a stand” or “make, stand or stop,” combined with Arma, which means “weapons.” A ceasefire is therefore literally a ceasefire. Armistice Day is the name of the holiday celebrated in the United States on November 11, before being renamed Veterans Day by Congress in 1954.
The original name refers to the agreement between the Allied powers and Germany to end the hostilities that constituted the First World War and which are to enter into force at the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month. Other weapons relating to Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Austria-Hungary were carried out on other dates before and after 11 November. Truce is often used as a generic term to refer to any suspension of conflict, especially between the warring armies. So what is the difference between a ceasefire, a ceasefire and a ceasefire? In general, these three terms mean much the same thing. A ceasefire is usually a temporary stop to an ongoing battle. A ceasefire often refers to an interruption of all hostilities – the agreement to end a war is sometimes called a ceasefire. Ceasefires and ceasefires are both examples of ceasefires, but the ceasefire is generally used on a smaller scale or more informally. The ceasefire and ceasefire are officially sounding, but the ceasefire often involves less formality. Remember that just because two armies, countries or people have agreed to a ceasefire does not mean that the conflict is over forever – some truces are only temporary. If they overcome by their desire for a ceasefire, they have accepted an instrument of war as a symbol of peace. The agreement or treaty that provides for such an impasse can also be described as a ceasefire. When used in the context of military conflicts, a ceasefire is often temporary and fixed for a specified period of time.
The ceasefire can also be used occasionally to refer to an agreement between two or more people, to end, argue or involve in a less serious form of conflict, such as a pillow fight (not that pillow fights cannot become intense enough). Under international law, a ceasefire is a legal agreement (often in a document) that puts an end to fighting between the “belligerents” of war or conflict.  In the Hague Convention of 1899, in which three treaties were concluded and three declarations were made, the Convention on the Laws and Customs of War in Rural Areas established that “if the duration of the ceasefire is not fixed”, the parties can resume fighting (Article 36) at their convenience, but with correct communications.